With the publication of the digital economy bill on Friday, we have taken a look at the recent proposals from a broadband perspective and spoken to our members.
When Lord Mandelson originally announced the intention to progress a three strikes plan to work against file-sharing in the UK, it understandably sparked a lot of debate.
The main concern we've heard is that it's open to errors, with the risk that innocent customers could be penalised. Broadband routers can be hacked, shared houses are impossible to manage, and businesses that offer internet (cafes, for example) would find the time or cost burden unworkable. We've not heard many facts about the appeal process, so can only guess at the impact this would have on customers, businesses and our customer service team.
There's also a wider question about what constitutes file sharing. The act of sharing a file can be done via so many methods, so which of these would be included and which wouldn't? Email, FTP, newsgroups, BitTorrent, instant messaging and online digital storage (Mandelson’s ‘cyberlockers’) are the most well-known but more will emerge. There seems to be a lack of technical understanding about what file sharing actually is, because most of these systems couldn't be monitored.
We prefer a future that benefits from technology advances rather than trying to shut it down. We think the smart people in modern creative industries are the ones that are adapting to the new world. Rather than building big, expensive software that people can't afford, more people are making apps that cost little but offer great value and offer updates that illegal software can't. There are examples in other industries too, like music with legal downloads and streaming, or legal movie rental services through PCs and games consoles.
Our members have never asked us to police their service, and sadly don't have enough information to believe this system can work.